Y0 — GTM Operating Doc (The Sales Spine)
Asset: Y0 | Workstream:
[GTM]| Ownership:[SO]| Owner: Sagar Status: drafted | Reviewers: Sagar (motion) · Nidhi (compliance-claim accuracy)Purpose: The index for everything in the GTM workstream. Defines who we sell to, the motion we run, the funnel stages, and — for each stage — which Y asset and which A-series automation backs it. If a funnel stage has no named Y asset, that is a gap to close.
1. Who we are (one paragraph)
SnowOps is a compliance-focused platform engineering company. We deliver engineered, audit-ready cloud platforms that are compliant by construction — not click-ops infrastructure with a compliance dashboard bolted on. Every deliverable is code, config, or a runnable artifact. We are founder-led (Sagar — infra/delivery; Nidhi — compliance/risk/ops), India-based, serving global clients.
2. Who we sell to (ICP recap — full detail in Y3)
- Segment: B2B SaaS · FinTech · HealthTech · Cloud-Native.
- Stage: Series A → pre-IPO.
- Size: 20–250 staff.
- Cloud: Azure-first (our M1/M2 delivery surface). GitHub for source/CI. (Azure DevOps clients supported from M3; AWS discovery from M4.)
- Pain that makes them buy:
- Click-ops infrastructure, fragile CI/CD, no GitOps.
- Missing SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA is blocking an enterprise deal or a funding round.
- First security/platform engineer just hired (or about to be) and drowning.
3. The motion: founder-led cold outbound
We do not wait for inbound. The motion is:
- Target a named account from the Y3 list against a buying signal.
- Reach out cold (email + LinkedIn) with the Y4 sequences. The CTA is always the free Discovery Audit — never "book a demo."
- The free G-series Discovery Audit (apps/discovery-auditor/) is the wedge: a read-only, branded posture report that creates urgency and a remediation roadmap pointing straight at our
claude.md§4 assets. - Findings review call walks the prospect through their own gaps.
- Proposal (Y6) turns the findings into a priced engagement.
- Close → Onboard (sales → delivery handoff, Y11).
Why the Discovery Audit is the wedge, not a demo: it is free, low-friction,
gives the prospect something of standalone value, and — because every finding
carries a remediation_asset_id — it is the pitch for the Baseline/Advanced
package without us having to sell. It also disqualifies fast: a clean tenant
isn't our buyer.
4. The funnel — stages, owners, and what backs each one
Each stage maps to at least one Y asset (content) and, where automated, an A-series asset (execution in HubSpot). This is the heart of Y0: no orphan stages.
| # | Stage | What happens | Y asset(s) | A-series automation | HubSpot deal stage (Y13) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Target | Source an ICP account against a buying signal; add to list. | Y3 | A1 (enrich), A2 (score + route) | — (lead/contact) |
| 2 | Outreach | Multi-touch cold email + LinkedIn. CTA = free audit. | Y4, Y1 | A5 (offer email on Qualified) |
New → Contacted |
| 3 | Discovery Audit | Run read-only Azure posture audit; deliver branded PDF. | G-series (tool), Y9 (sample report) | A5 (dispatch G4), G4/G5 (discovery_report_url) |
Audit Running |
| 4 | Findings Review | Walk prospect through findings + roadmap; qualify hard. | Y5, Y7 | — | Findings Reviewed |
| 5 | Proposal | Findings → scoped, priced SOW. | Y6, Y2, Y8 | A3 (render proposal PDF) | Proposal Sent |
| 6 | Close | Negotiate, paper, sign. | Y12 | — | Negotiation → Closed Won |
| 7 | Onboard | Sales→delivery handoff; provision repo + Azure. | Y11 | A4 (kickoff webhook → B1) | Onboarding |
| 8 | Expand / Renew | QBRs, Baseline→Advanced upsell, renewal. | Y11, Y10 | — | Customer / Expansion |
| — | Nurture (parallel) | No-response revival, post-proposal follow-up, lost-deal re-engagement. | Y10 | A5/nurture | (any stage transition) |
Drafting note: stages 5–8 link to Y assets not yet drafted. Those links are the to-do list — the same
[[name]]-style forward reference pattern used elsewhere. As each Y asset lands, its row here becomes live.
5. The expansion ladder (commercial spine — detail in Y2 / claude.md §3.8)
We land small and expand, we do not sell isolated SKUs:
Free Discovery Audit → Starter / Quick-Win [QW] → Baseline "Cloud Secure" [B] → Advanced "Certification-Ready" [A]
(lead magnet) (proof of value) (the core engagement) (audit-ready, parallel to auditor)
│
└─ Retainer = the recurring engine (drift, evidence, posture upkeep)
Project fees fund delivery; the managed retainer is the durable revenue.
6. Roles
| Person | Owns |
|---|---|
| Sagar | Outbound, discovery calls, technical scoping, proposals, delivery, pricing decisions. |
| Nidhi | Compliance-claim review on every outward asset, discovery-call compliance depth, audit-readiness narrative, contract/DPA review. |
7. Success metrics (what we watch per stage)
| Stage | Primary metric | Target (initial — revisit after first 10 deals) |
|---|---|---|
| Outreach | Positive-reply rate | ≥ 8% (cold) |
| Discovery Audit | Audit-accepted rate (of positive replies) | ≥ 50% |
| Findings Review | Review-booked rate (of audits delivered) | ≥ 60% |
| Proposal | Proposal→Close rate | ≥ 30% |
| Overall | Cold-touch → Closed Won | track; no target until baseline established |
| Retention | Retainer renewal rate | ≥ 90% |
These are the dials Y10 and Y13 instrument in HubSpot. Numbers are starting hypotheses, not commitments.
8. Guardrails (from claude.md Output Guardrails)
- ❌ Never position as generic IT consulting, offshoring, or advisory-only gap analysis.
- ✅ Authoritative, deeply technical, outcome-focused.
- ✅ Every claim in a sales asset traces to a real §4 asset (shipped or flagged roadmap). Nidhi gates compliance claims — no over-promising on audit guarantees.
Definition of Done (Y0)
- Every funnel stage (§4) maps to ≥ 1 named Y asset and, where automated, an A-series asset — no orphan stage. (Met in draft; verify after Y assets land.)
- Reviewed by Nidhi for compliance-claim accuracy.
- Reconciled with Y13 deal stages once Y13 is drafted.
Sign-off
- Reviewer: _ | Date: _ | Result: PASS / FAIL
- Notes: